US Appeals Court Won't Immediately Allow Trump Asylum Ban - NBC Connecticut
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

US Appeals Court Won't Immediately Allow Trump Asylum Ban

At issue is President Donald Trump's Nov. 9 proclamation that barred anyone who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border between official ports of entry from seeking asylum

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    The new way doctors are treating cleft lip and palate
    Guillermo Arias/AFP/Getty Images
    A Central American migrant traveling in a caravan, stands near his tent at a temporary shelter in eastern Tijuana, Mexico, on December 6, 2018. Thousands of Central American migrants, seeking asylum in the United States, have trekked for over a month.

    A divided U.S. appeals court late Friday refused to immediately allow the Trump administration to enforce a ban on asylum for any immigrants who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border.

    The ban is inconsistent with an existing U.S. law and an attempted end-run around Congress, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 2-1 decision.

    "Just as we may not, as we are often reminded, 'legislate from the bench,' neither may the Executive legislate from the Oval Office," 9th Circuit Judge Jay Bybee, a nominee of Republican President George W. Bush, wrote for the majority.

    A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice, Steven Stafford, did not have a comment. But he referred to an earlier statement that called the asylum system broken and said the department looked forward to "continuing to defend the Executive Branch's legitimate and well-reasoned exercise of its authority to address the crisis at our southern border."

    Trump Denies Bombshell Russia Reports From NYT, Post

    [NATL] Trump Denies Bombshell Russia Reports From NYT, Washington Post

    President Donald Trump responded to accusations of Russian collusion in two separate bombshell reports from the New York Times and the Washington Post. Trump denied that he fired former FBI Director James Comey to advance Russian interests and a Post report that he hid conversations he had with Vladimir Putin.

    (Published Monday, Jan. 14, 2019)

    At issue is President Donald Trump's Nov. 9 proclamation that barred anyone who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border between official ports of entry from seeking asylum. Trump issued the proclamation in response to caravans of migrants approaching the border.

    A lower court judge temporarily blocked the ban and later refused to immediately reinstate it. The administration appealed to the 9th Circuit for an immediate stay of Judge Jon Tigar's Nov. 19 temporary restraining order.

    In a dissenting opinion Friday, 9th Circuit Judge Edward Leavy said the administration "adopted legal methods to cope with the current problems rampant at the southern border." Nothing in the law the majority cited prevented a rule categorically barring eligibility for asylum on the basis of how a person entered the country, Leavy, a nominee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, said.

    In his Nov, 19 ruling, Tigar sided with legal groups who argued that federal law is clear that immigrants in the U.S. can request asylum regardless of whether they entered legally.

    The president "may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden," the judge said in his order.

    The ruling led to an unusually public dispute between Trump and Chief Justice John Roberts after Trump dismissed Tigar — an appointee of Trump's predecessor — as an "Obama judge."

    Judge Blocks Trump Birth Control Coverage Rules in 13 States

    [NATL-PHI] Judge Blocks Trump Birth Control Coverage Rules in Delaware, Other States

    A Trump Administration rule that would allow more employers to opt out of covering birth control from women will not take effect on Monday as scheduled. The rules would let employers claim exemption for religious or moral reasons. Delaware is one of the 13 states that sued to have the rule stopped.

    (Published Monday, Jan. 14, 2019)

    Roberts responded with a statement that the federal judiciary doesn't have "Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges."